CURRENT PROJECTS

RESTING SAFE
www.restingsafe.org
EJ & HOMELESSNESS: RESTING SAFE, addresses the urban political ecology of US homelessness. In the context of an ongoing housing crisis, an extraordinary climate emergency, and ever-shrinking social safety nets, an unprecedented number of people live unsheltered today. In dialogue with urban political ecology,  geographies of homelessness, and environmental justice (EJ) research and organizing, and drawing on seven years of participant observation and a national phone survey of nearly fifty houseless community representatives, the first phase of RESTING SAFE charts an inaugural baseline critical EJ analysis of homelessness. Houseless people indeed suffer from noise, air, and soil pollution; mold, rodents, and pests; extreme weather; and more. But I argue that to understand the EJ experiences of houseless people, it is necessary to examine much more than just direct hazard exposure. Sweeps – evictions – in downtown and residential areas push people into toxic spaces. In turn, cities overwhelmingly respond to environmental hazard concerns with more displacement—creating a cycle of criminalization, dangerous living conditions, and serial forced removal. This incarceration-exposure-eviction cycle affects the vast majority of houseless people, and multiplies and magnifies other forms of violence that disproportionately impact people along lines of race, gender, age, (dis)ability, and so on.

EJ TOOLKIT: This critical EJ analysis of homelessness is informing creation of a harm reduction-inspired "EJ Toolkit", in collaboration with a Portland-based houseless-led group with which I have worked since 2013, Right 2 Survive. Our Toolkit includes a series of pamphlets, posters, and online resources created by and for houseless people, designed to help communities mitigate environmental hazards such as mold, fire, and rodents. And to enable houseless communities to test for air pollution in their encampments, we are developing low-tech, low-cost protocols with colleagues in Baltimore that entail collecting spider webs to test for diesel particulate matter. Undergirding this Toolkit tactic is an understanding that local and federal public agencies cannot be counted on to intervene in the interests of houseless people; a response that simultaneously addresses immediate threats to survival, at the same time as it engages people and builds political consciousness that informs collective action against sweeps, is necessary.

Sleep Not Sweeps: The Role of Business Improvement Districts in Criminalizing Basic Survival
www.wraphome.org
Houseless people sleep, rest, eat, and perform other basic survival functions in public space. Yet, people are rarely able to conduct such life-sustaining activities in any one place with regularity: when police, private security guards, parks employees, vigilante group members, and others utter the words “move along”, people begin packing their belongings. Weekly and even daily sweeps – evictions – from public spaces are one of the most defining and traumatizing things about being unsheltered in the US. Sweeps cause houseless people to lose their survival gear, identification, medicines, and treasured mementos. Sweeps also generate fines and citations that create additional barriers to becoming housed. Over the last three decades, as part of a larger process of privatizing public space, Business Improvement Districts (BIDs) are a driving force behind the proliferation of forced removals. BIDs are funded by local property assessments and have little public oversite. Unpacking how they operate is one key piece to understanding, as Staeheli and Mitchell (2008) put it, “how particular private interests prevail in public space”—the places where houseless people so often make their homes. Properly conceptualizing BIDs is also crucial for conceptualizing what constitutes legitimate activity, and by whom, on publicly-owned property—and therefore for organizing for more just cities. In collaboration with the San Francisco-based Western Regional Advocacy Project, a coalition of houseless-led grassroots groups from California, Oregon, and Colorado, I am part of a community- and university-based research team investigating the rise, spread, and impacts of Business Improvement Districts (BIDs) on human survival.

Green City Rising: Portland Harbor Superfund Site Contamination, Cleanup, and Collective Action
My dissertation research examined grassroots organizing in so-called “sustainable cities” through ethnographic and archival research. Three questions guided this research: In green cities... 1) What historical and present-day circumstances give rise to grassroots collective action? 2) How do grassroots groups organize to ensure equitable distribution of benefits (e.g., jobs, affordable housing, green space, etc.) emerging from urban sustainability initiatives? and 3) What role does learning play in the politicization and collective action of people working for social and environmental justice in the context of the green city? I addressed these questions through an extended case study with the Portland Harbor Community Coalition, a group of urban Native people, Black/African American Portlanders, immigrants, refugees, and houseless people who are fighting for more equitable benefits of Portland Harbor Superfund site remediation. I argue that at the same time as a-political, de-historicized sustainability discourse forecloses legitimate public participation opportunities for grassroots groups to shape in urban greening processes, the contradictions of so-called green cities simultaneously open possibilities for cross-class, cross-race coalitions to make incremental progress toward a more just sustainability through a combination of state-sponsored and direct action channels. This research also reveals how marginalized communities face substantial obstacles posed by actors promoting traditional urban growth—even in Portland, a paradigmatic sustainable city with a worldwide reputation for green growth. I am working on a book based on this research, under contract with the University of Georgia Press, for the Geographies of Justice and Sustainability Series.

"On one side is the fire department. On the other side is [an airfield]. There are lots of sirens and planes taking off and landing. Across the street is train tracks. We are at a nexus of noise pollution where no one would ever want to be."
                                 -Interview Participant

"We are organized, we are taking control of our own resources. We create a safe place for displaced people to learn to interact with their neighbors, to build trust. We are supposed to be a place of transition. But there is literally nowhere else for people to go [aside from polluted land]."
                              -Interview participant

PAST PROJECTS

No-Cause Evictions: Culturally Specific Experiences of Housing Instability
This study investigates experiences of housing instability with three (often overlapping) groups: Black/African Americans, LGBTQ people, and elders. Tenant leaders who identify as members of these communities have embarked on a year-long collaborative project to learn how to conduct research, analyze data in historical context, and disseminate findings via several mediums, in their own communities and beyond. In addition to contributing a comparative perspective to scholarly conversations, the results of this research will contribute to CAT's efforts to establish rent stabilization laws and a "just cause" standard for eviction for the state of Oregon. This community-based participatory research project is in collaboration with the Community Alliance of Tenants and Dr. Moriah McSharry McGrath (Portland State University), and is funded by the Sociological Initiatives Foundation. 

Equity Planning: The Community Watershed Stewardship Program
Unless social justice objectives are pursued explicitly in sustainability planning, green initiatives tend to reinforce existing race- and class-based disparities. Yet, critiques of sustainability planning rarely offer concrete suggestions for more emancipatory ways forward. Examining exceptional cases in which municipal leaders have already taken alternative paths provides a window into the politics, power dynamics, and practices involved in urban greening initiatives that are attendant to the needs of historically marginalized groups. Moreover, bringing attention to such examples may provide inspiration and the foundations of a strategic approach for other municipal leaders seeking to cultivate a more just sustainability (Agyeman 2005). This research draws on Norman Krumholz’s equity planning framework to outline how one municipal program in Portland, Oregon, the Community Watershed Stewardship Program, overtly prioritizes the needs and desires of underrepresented groups as part of its watershed health mission.

Portland Black Gardens https://portlandblackgardens.weebly.com/
A collaboration between MudBone Grown urban agriculture collective and Portland State University (led by Dr. Nathan McClintock and Dr. Julius McGee, funded by the Antipode Foundation), this project is focused on collecting, archiving, and sharing the gardening stories of African American elders, to honor their contributions to Portland's history and foodways, and to teach the wider community about this important legacy. What is the history of Black gardening in Portland, and in particular the Green Fingers Project, in a context of racialized segregation and serial displacement? How did city policies help or hinder Black gardening in Portland from the 1960s to the early 80s? How has gardening contributed to community self-determination and a sense of place for Black Portlanders? Recordings and transcripts will be archived in the PSU Library Special Collections, and will be publicly available online.

​Sustainable City Uneven Development
This collaborative research project with Jamaal Green and Dr. Nathan McClintock drew on census data, popular media, newspaper archives, city planning documents, and secondary source histories to elucidate the structural origins of Portland's "uneven development", exploring how and why the urban core of this paragon of sustainability has become more White and affluent while its outer eastside has become more diverse and poor. We explain how a "sustainability fix"--in this case, green investment in the city's core--ultimately contributed to the demarcation of racialized poverty along 82nd Avenue, a major north-south arterial marking the boundary of East Portland. Our account of structural processes taking place at multiple scales contributes to a growing body of scholarship on eco-gentrification and displacement and inner-ring suburban change while empirically demonstrating how Portland's advances in sustainability have come at the cost of East Portland's devaluation.